JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sony A6700 : Specifications and Opinions

The Sony A6700 is a mirrorless camera with APS-C (1.5x) sensor and 26 megapixels manufactured from 2023. The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 50 - 102400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 11 FPS x 59 RAW, 1000 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1499 €;

24 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10

Sensor
Format	APS-C, 23.5 x 15.7 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.5x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	26 megapixel (pixel pitch 3.76 μm)
ISO sensitivities	50 - 102400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/8000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Sony E (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	Yes
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	11 FPS x 59 RAW, 1000 JPEG
Pre-Burst	No
Live View	Yes
Video mode	4K (3840x2160p) @ 60 FPS
WiFi	Yes
GPS	No
USB	USB-C (3.2 2x2)
USB Charging	Yes
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	No
Focus Stacking	No
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	Yes
LCD	3.0″, 1.04 Mdots, 720 x 480 pixels, articulated
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 0.71x
Viewfinder resolution	1024 x 768 px
Flash	No
Storage	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-II)
Storage, Slot 2	not available
Shutter	Mechanical and electronic
Battery	Sony NP-FZ100, 16.40 Wh
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	493 g
Dimensions	122 x 69 x 64 mm
Buy
Sony A6700, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 248000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Easyvision17

sent on May 14, 2024

Pros: Autofocus for subject priority, new video performance, new menu, larger battery, new body and layout and much more.

Cons: Display of a bit "right" size for the amount of icons present.

Opinion: Sony a6700 compared to its predecessors there have certainly been important and very interesting adjustments. I come from a fantastic a6500 from which I made a series of comparisons to actually understand the impact of the new improvements. The strong points that give it added value are certainly, the new ring to change the modes from photo, video to S&Q Motion, the look of the new menu with multiple parameterizable items, the autofocus system that allows you to select a subject priority, the articulated display, more battery and differentiated access compartments. On the full specifications you can see and appreciate all the features and performance in detail. Video stabilization, finally the possibility of digitally stabilizing with a small crop has also been introduced, and from here a piece of advice for Sony comes spontaneously to me, in addition to activating or deactivating digital stabilization why not give the user the possibility of how much to stabilize perhaps with 3 different levels of crops? With a software update it would be solved quickly. Between the a6700 and the a6500 the main improvements have a greater impact on the video options, true that the sensor is different, but one thing caught my attention, the ISO. I read on other reviews from users who complained about too much "noise" caused at high ISO compared to the a6500. From here I was curious to check this thing. I took a series of test shots at high ISO (from 6400 to 30,000 ISO) with both the a6700 and the a6500 while maintaining exactly the same parameters/lens on a tripod. I then converted the raw files to JPG without adding any type of filter. The result surprised me because comparing the photos with the same ISO in fact the a6700 has more noise than the a6500, but also the exposure is much higher. So this is not the correct interpretation because the exposures of the photos are different. Comparing instead by "exposure", and I mean the same lights and shadows that you see in practice on the monitor, the photos are practically identical but with different ISO. So my deduction is that by obtaining the same exposure of photos, the a6700 has no more "noise" than the a6500, but it will be necessary to reason by maintaining much lower ISO than the a6500 to have the same result. The reason is unknown to me (Sony why?) but being used to the a6500 I will have to re-evaluate the ISO setting on the a6700 in a decidedly different way. Mysteries of science! As for video heating, I recommend recording with the display open and changing the temperature alarm from standard to high and adding an external power bank. Everything depends on how much you want to record continuously and with what parameters. Another advantage is certainly the lens park with a wide choice. I haven't had the opportunity to test everything in detail yet because it takes time but in any case it is certainly a very, very good and complete car. In addition to the customizable keys, it is also possible to create a customizable menu in order to help and speed up some controls. Improved? Like all things... but I would say that today it is a nice little monster in line with current technology (even something more). I recommend it, but not for first-time users! (Pass me the term). In summary... so much stuff! Good continuation to all.

Raffaelloamerighi

sent on February 27, 2024

Pros: Very compact, really tiny; exceptional build quality; exceptional autofocus; good hybrid machine; new Sony menus.

Cons: I wouldn't get it at full price, also because it doesn't cost much less than an A7C II and doesn't give much more than a ZV E10; internal stabilization still not very incisive; built-in single-capsule microphone; lack of motorized zoom lever;

Opinion: This is a first contact amateur opinion, in practice I make considerations as a consumer. Not really technical. I state that I own a ZV E10, I mainly make videos and I was interested in getting the 6700 as a replacement. No particular reason, I just had the monkey to have the latest Sony APSC in the field, to be able to better enjoy a couple of new lenses I bought. My approach to this camera body took place in two steps: the first directly in the shop, where I found a used one. It was a fleeting contact, because the option I was given was to immediately give in the ZV E10. The price was also affordable, taking into account the trade-in but, not being completely convinced, mainly because of the many reviews seen and read on the net, almost all of which were sponsored, I resisted the temptation, but I still asked to be able to try it for a few minutes. So I made an effort to pay attention to a few things right away. First of all, after turning it on, I inserted my SD card and started a test video to test the overheating that is so much talked about. I confirm: the camera body is already warm after a few seconds. Not boiling, but too hot to be on recording for less than a minute. Then I notice the position of the hot-shoe, which is decidedly less practical than on the ZV E10. I also study the EVF a little (whose absence is one of the main reasons why the ZV E10 fits me), but here we reach the absurd. The viewfinder is so awkward and small that even I, who am quite small, cannot put my eye in it to look. Especially seeing the masterpiece they managed to do on the A7 CII, Sony's designers could have made a little effort here too. Compactness is therefore good, but it is little in the face of the fact that vital accessories (EVFs) are unusable. Apart from that, I can't reject a camera like that in a few seconds. I left it in the shop to think about it. I sense that there are many functions to take advantage of, so I ordered it online to see if - keeping it a few more days - I can change my mind. I notice another annoying detail: the sad built-in microphone with a single capsule, whose audio performance is still sufficient. Another annoying detail: I don't think it has a motorized zoom lever. It is true that motorized zooms are now few, but taking into account that it is sold in kit (also) with the 16-50mm, which is a power zoom lens, I find it bizarre to say the least. The only reason why I could consider keeping it and not making the return is the possibility of installing the LUTs directly in the room, but I have to think about it, I don't know if it's enough. Perhaps, for a purely photographic use, the above is completely irrelevant, but in the video field it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. The autofocus is prodigious, a leap forward from every point of view. Even compared to the ZV E10, which was already a notch above the segment average. Finally, color science makes it possible to obtain the restitution of colors that are not obtained with previous generation APSCs. For a flagship and for the asking price, the single SD slot is not a good thing. Half a word I spend on the stabilization in the room, which in my opinion is "6 minus minus". In fact, it is necessary to distinguish between stabilization useful for photos and that useful for videos. Here we have a stabilization that is useful for photos, but it is also sold as useful for videos. Handheld shots taken with its internal stabilization system are only good when done from a standstill. The IBIS systems on the A7C II and on the ZV E1 are completely different (the ZV E10 doesn't have it at all, except in an electronic and somewhat fake version).

Sigmarco

sent on October 07, 2023

Pros: Compactness, autofocus, image quality, functions, video compartment, stabilization

Cons: Price? Really?

Opinion: Compactness: it has the same dimensions, except for the depth of the grip, of the Panasonic GX80, do I need to say more? Autofocus: PERFECT. Image quality: always excellent. Functions: Infinite. Video sector: there is everything and more. Stabilization: we have you too. In short, there are those who say that it costs a lot, and perhaps subjectively for someone can also be a high price. But this machine has it all. And I challenge you to find such a complete machine at this price.

Ruggio

sent on September 14, 2023

Pros: Autofocus, construction, weight and dimensions, new sensor, improved stabilizer

Cons: High ISO yield; side viewfinder; They did not implement the shots per second.

Opinion: Starting from the disadvantages I would indicate as first the yield at high ISO. Compared to the A6600 (which I owned and had a normal yield) I find that for the same light there is about 1/3 maybe 1/2 stop of noise more. The 11 shots per second are great for many things but a camera like this, devoted to the "dynamic" side of photography, could have given something more. The side viewfinder makes aiming more difficult when mounted you have a telephoto lens (for example the 200-600). With the same equivalent focal length, compared to the A7 or A9 families I sometimes have to look for the subject longer before framing it or even moving the eye away from the eyepiece to look for it again and then return to aim. Let's talk about the positive aspects which are many. The AI linked to AF is remarkable, it almost always finds the subject regardless of what the surrounding environment is. The AF on the eye or head allows you to always have the subject in focus where the focus is needed. Excellent performance even with 1.4x converter on 200-600. The construction is excellent on the line of the A6600. Weight and size make it a perfect travel companion. The new sensor is more "crisp" than the previous one and the difference is noticeable especially at medium / low iso. The ergonomics are better than the A6600 and despite having relatively large hands I have no problem holding it and finding the keys. The stabilizer in the car works better than the previous version and finally I find it adequate for the machine segment. After a few thousand shots I am very happy with the purchase. PS. SCANDALOUS that in the box there is not even the battery charger.

GTavasci

sent on September 08, 2023

Pros: Fantastic autofocus. Low weight and size. Good battery life. Shooting quality.

Cons: Ergonomics not excellent. Decentralized viewfinder. Stabilization still improvable. One SD slot.

Opinion: I have been using FF and Micro 4/3 for a long time. This is the first APS-C I take, having always considered the format not as small as the micro 4/3 and not of quality equal to the FF. A middle ground, as it actually is. I open the box and discover that the cable and the power supply are missing. There is nothing apart from battery and strap. The arms become heavy. I take it in my hand and immediately wonder who put the two rings in that position. I will never find them on the fly. Arms at lead level. Then, I take it with me and go out. I turn it on while walking and I like the new menu immediately. The screen with touch icons as well. The viewfinder is definitely better than that of my A7C. It is light and small but does not escape from the hands. A little relief. I see a buzzard at a sidereal distance and point it. The A6700, by pressing the AF button set to tracking, hooks it immediately. She moves, the camera follows her. I move the camera left and right and the subject is always in the green pointer. Not bad. Too bad only for the decentralized viewfinder, typical of these compacts, which does not help to find the subject on the fly (with a pushed telephoto is really difficult). I search and find the "usual" cat. Here the A6700 first engages the body, then the head and immediately the eye. He doesn't let go. I start smiling. I go home and open the files with PS (Pure Raw still does not recognize the format). They are my usual test shots, shadows, backlight, from flowers to landscapes. Everything is normal, possibility of recovery shadows and lights not equal to the A7C but better than the OM-5. More evident noise than the FF already at 1600 iso but also manageable by PS / ACR. So I rate size and weight against the microscopic OM-5. As weight we are there, in size there is not an abyss. The lenses are larger but the ones I took (10-20 and others) are not at all exaggerated. And if I want quality and accept weight, I can also put those of FF. I spend the evening exploring the menu, the AF one in particular. And I have confirmation. This small room is a monster. It outclasses my A7C in AF, the menu is from another era, the viewfinder much more acceptable. Then he has the two rings, even if badly put for me. The spark has struck. We will go a long way together!

Photos taken with Sony A6700

Natural Black & White

by Francesco I.
74 comments, 3041 views

HI RES 25.6 MP

Village

by TakeABreak
42 comments, 3179 views

HI RES 20.9 MP

Val di Fumo

by Ruggio
22 comments, 3818 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Fiorrancino al bagno.....

by Anto55
32 comments, 1870 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

Braking rail

by Anto55
35 comments, 2109 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

Greenland

by Il Vime
11 comments, 842 views

HI RES 25.6 MP

Stephanie

by Emilio94
9 comments, 2785 views

HI RES 25.6 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Joyce

by Emilio94
6 comments, 2418 views

HI RES 25.6 MP

The prey for the pullets

by Anto55
26 comments, 776 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Petra

by Alessandro57
20 comments, 1916 views

HI RES 21.6 MP

Diatribes

by Anto55
28 comments, 1949 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Antonella

by Emilio94
11 comments, 1792 views

HI RES 21.6 MP

Maternal gaze

by Anto55
31 comments, 619 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

The colors of green...

by Anto55
24 comments, 506 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Crane

by Anto55
30 comments, 1077 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Momo120
16 comments, 1148 views

The sled is ready.

by Alessandro57
41 comments, 1160 views

HI RES 21.0 MP

Who are you?

by Anto55
25 comments, 1342 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Carnival in Venice

by Anto55
26 comments, 423 views

Red Kite Tack

by Anto55
24 comments, 971 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Rapunzel

by Emilio94
10 comments, 1318 views

HI RES 21.8 MP

Patrol.....

by Anto55
15 comments, 1158 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Great Kestrel (Falco rupicoloides)

by Francesco I.
14 comments, 455 views

HI RES 19.0 MP

Plays of light

by Alessandro57
34 comments, 1650 views

HI RES 21.6 MP

A good haul

by Il Vime
15 comments, 852 views

HI RES 14.9 MP

Petra

by Alessandro57
14 comments, 1055 views

HI RES 24.1 MP

Humpback whales

by Il Vime
6 comments, 568 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Set

by Anto55
17 comments, 339 views

HI RES 3.9 MP

Rude...

by Anto55
22 comments, 326 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Unfair competition in Cefalù

by Francesco Puglisi
17 comments, 2558 views

HI RES 24.4 MP

Mushroom in the desert (Wadi Rum)

by Alessandro57
17 comments, 944 views

HI RES 22.4 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

The macaon

by Anto55
20 comments, 454 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Try Sony

by Agoluc78
39 comments, 1282 views

HI RES 19.2 MP

Ambient Flight

by Anto55
13 comments, 1068 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Visual Dialogue

by Francesco I.
12 comments, 318 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Viterbo (Italy)

by Alessandro57
21 comments, 970 views

HI RES 19.3 MP

The Fiorrancino

by Anto55
18 comments, 822 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Sony » Sony A6700

Sony A6700 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Sony A6700