JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2007 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1682 €;
195 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 247000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: General robustness (except the zoom ring), acceptable sharpness on sensors <= 16Mpix. Used market price.
Cons: Heterogeneous quality depending on the focal lengths.
Opinion: This is a patriarch that I acquired the year it was released. I worked with this object for years in events. Probably the weakest of the 14-24 / 24-70 / 70-200 triptych. With the progress of optics, our requirements push us to depreciate it in favor of modern lenses... however at the second-hand price <500€, it remains a good deal for the non-professional who needs a large aperture .
That said, I ended up selling it. The reason is that as my experience progressed, I criticized it more and more for the distortions on the edges at 24mm (as well as the terrible chromatic aberrations at this focal length), also its lack of sharpness at 70mm. I ended up favoring the much better 35-50mm focal range. Finally, on D750 (24Mpix), I did not consider it to be up to modern competitors.
In my opinion, it all depends on the price you get it for on the second-hand market...
Pros: Velocidad de AF, definición desde f/2,8, colores,construción, rango focal......
Cons: Precio nuevo
Opinion: Comprado nuevo en 2007, sigue funcionando como el primer día, bodas, deportes, paisaje......
Hay gente que se queja de falta de nitidez en las esquinas,yo no tengo ninguna queja, para mi rinde perfectamente en cámaras como la Nikon D3s, D800...., después de 14 años trabajando con el, sigue funcionando perfectamente,al precio que esta hoy de segunda mano es una autentica ganga.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness and color rendering and brilliance.
Cons:Nothing
Opinion:The construction is not excellent but still being a professional lens it must be treated with due caution. I found a good used and bought it immediately and mounted on my Nikon D810 and tried churns out respectable images. The use I make of it goes from landscape to portrait, definitively if you know how to use it it gives images that are to be adjusted little in post-production. My personal rating is 9.8
Opinion:I started unfortunately with a 24-120 f4 but the love never blossomed and so after 11 months, I bought the 24-70 and immediately found it very well. Yes, it's a heavy lens that at the end of the day I feel on my back and neck, but the photos I take have colors, brightness and sharpness that I didn't find in the previous optics. It has lenses of a heavier weight and higher quality inside and you pay for this economically and in weight. This version lacks VR compared to the 24-120, but the stabilization of the nikon z6 reduces the risk; while when I use the D750 I'm more careful when shooting. At the time of purchase for me it was not worth adding about another 1000 euros to take the vr version. The lens hood to mount is always awkward, the same as the 17-55 f2.8. Rated 9
user249402
sent on September 10, 2023
Pros:Remarkable optical quality.
Cons:Construction not up to the mark.
Opinion:It may be that I was "loser", my specimen, taken new from Nital, soon showed a whole series of problems, the autofocus failed after a few months of moderate use, repaired under warranty, after about a year began to have problems with the rings, then the autofocus broke again, repaired, always under warranty, as soon as I returned I put it on sale and took the Sigma counterpart. I give him 7, although I think he doesn't deserve it.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
