JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 249000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user213929
sent on December 15, 2022
Pros:A TA 1.2 sharp rendering and progression of the soft blur, af precise even if not lightning, exceptional minimum distance in relation to the aperture.
Cons:The price due to the period.
Opinion:Lens that does better than a 90 wr in terms of sharpness being an f 1.2, a minimum distance more than filmic, crazy engraving, 400 gr little weight compared to the one of 800 gr, remains fixed on the Xt3 with Bg, I will try to test it well on 18/12/2022 for the portrait open day that I organized, I will update as soon as possible. Well... at the end of the evening I processed only jpg in the car for some cut, I did not intervene on the color, very well the colors, the aberrations are contained, but not non-existent as I thought without having squeezed it after this day, the sharpness I confirm how close it can to the medium format, the autofocus is much improved compared to the previous version, the minimum distance I needed for the second newborn of the day, I still reserve to do other heavy sessions but shooting in Raf , the jpg as beautiful as they can give artifacts , so I will update shortly.
Pros:Improved in almost all the " defects " of the previous 56
Cons:I state that I have to test it calmly, but for now nothing
Opinion:I wrote " defects " in quotation marks because, my personal opinion, I remove too much definition but when it is missing you can not add it. I did some fast and home tests and therefore I reserve the right to complete my review later with more accuracy. I was lucky enough to have both the previous 56 F 1.2 and the 50 F1, and the new 56 to take decidedly from the 50 F1 but eliminated the defect of the 50 weight and bulk, the real Achilles heel of that optics. I like the fact that it is a little more chubby than its predecessor, I feel it well in my hand, the key that blocks the aperture ring, great. Another very welcome thing is the tropicalization, it is not that I often go to photograph in the rain, but it is also useful for the usual problem of dust. Focus ring is really guduriosa, rubbed the right. What really struck me, returning to my first words is the really excellent sharpness, the AC for those few shots I made, have been improved, but this is a test that I could not complete, as indeed for the AF speech, but from what little I saw, in combination with the XH2s, there seems to be a good improvement in speed. It certainly cannot be compared to the 23 or the 33 new series with all the lenses it has to move. The evaluation whether to replace the old 56 to this I do not feel give it, considering the difference in price, I can only tell you, go and try it does not disappoint expectations (indeed) in the most absolute way. If I can see to publish some photos photos, purely for demonstration purposes of the tests I did
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
