|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Silver58 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Silver58  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony RX100 Pros: Portability, good yield with poor lighting, great sensor for being a pocket-sized, robust (great backpack) Cons: No viewfinder Opinion: Socket used to have a real pocket for use in emergency, tested to me actually surprised me. I also had the rifle in a suitcase, but as often happens in vacation, you decide last minute changes and if there is anything else you snap with what's on the bag, in all situations the small rx100 helped me to bring at home the good shots. rnOnly the reflex is always the reflex and there are occasions where it can not be validly replaced, the rx 100 does not fit much for the good optics it uses, for the sensor with a good dynamic range, the raw files that it generates are easily workable and the battery life is more than dignified, the only limitation and the lack of viewfinder that remains in my opinion indispensable in some very sunny situations and to make a good start from the first click . rnPorted home with little more than two hundred euros is worth it all and I really feel a good deal. sent on September 10, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-M1 Pros: Small size, complete command, quality 'image. Cons: Unreactive in all situations, lack of viewfinder. Opinion: I enjoyed the pleasure of use of this camera, now that I think of being able to talk about it replaced with serenity ', but first things ordine.rnAffascinato and intrigued by the world mirrorless I decide to see if everything' that is said about these cameras matches in truth, after scouring the various forums looking for informed opinions, having a tight budget, but wanting to absolutely try the X-Trans sensor I decide to purchase entry level home fuji, the beautiful X-M1.rnHo He had the car in his hands for six months and can confirm what already 'exposed by other reviewers who have preceded me, that quality' remarkable picture (and now I'm testing my new camera I have to say that in terms of quality ' image not see significant differences), resistance to high iso truly exceptional (I have often noticed only by reading the Exif data of the downloaded files), positioning of the controls improved, but already very good, jpg already ready in camera.rnL '; Optical kit, the goal XF 16-50 is not a lightning war, but it is definitely decent and still allows you to bring home always good scatti.rnIl focusing system is not yet up to the best SLR, but is definitely good for pictures taken without haste, at first I had to throw a lot of pictures to blur, but I think that what 'is part of the natural study of a camera, I add that after some months of use I'd learned to chase the subject with discreet successo.rnTutto well then, you say ..... then why you replaced? rnAvendo had in years more 'cameras type bridge I thought accustomed to the use of the display back to compose the various poses so I thought that the lack of viewfinder was painless, in favor of this choice I must say that the viewfinder tilting the X-M1 is beautiful, large, bright and comfortable assolutamete in many situations, but despite my efforts are absolutely not able to handle it (maybe too many information?), So in the end I decided to replace it with a camera with viewfinder evf.rnConcludendo seems to me that the definition of the entry level machine, you can 'refer exclusively to market positioning, not the general quality of the product, that the feeling Plastic that some reviewers have had is acceptable, but we must not forget what is the cost of this camera, which in my opinion is to be awarded for its good overall performance .rnUna small addition, but I think important, the files generated from the sensor are very rich in information, in order to obtain these results, the Fuji has embarked on the path of a switch without filter bayer and innovative with a matrix, and for this reason that the main programs of post-production initially had some difficulties in correctly demosaicizzare the raw products in the room, there are several open discussions in the forum on this topic. Wanting to share my experience I can say that for the capacity evaluation of an average user, which I believe, the workflow of themghtroom 5.7 produces good results (I update the post 08.05.15 saying that with lightroom 6.1.1 has made a further step forward for a good file processing raf). To give feedback to my statement I published a gallery of tests, to the following address http://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=107828&l=it, any comment will be welcome .rnUn greeting to all users Site will read the review. rnrnP.S ........ I forgot to say that now I'm having an X-E2, which I hope will give me 'many satisfactions of X-M1rn sent on March 15, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
