JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 248000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 08, 2013 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image is too small to release a more detailed judgment :-|. It seems to me, however, that the maf is uncertain. His right eye is leggermemte out pdc, his left is completely out of focus. bearing in mind that it was a frontal intake of static subject in both eyes should be clear and then included pdc. It was preferable to close at least f3, 2. (Imho). hello, laurel L'immagine è troppo piccola per rilasciare un giudizio più approfondito. Mi sembra comunque che la maf sia incerta. Il suo occhio dx è leggermemte fuori pdc, il suo sinistro è completamente fuori fuoco. tenendo presente che era una ripresa frontale su soggetto statico entrambi gli occhi dovevano risultare nitidi e quindi inclusi pdc. Era preferibile chiudere almeno a f.3,2 . (imho) . ciao, lauro
sent on October 08, 2013 (22:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the photo is not that good ... I've done several and many were thrown away. It 'been a good workout on several fronts. a little 'to familiarize yourself with the lens (just in front of the pc I realized the incorrect focus), a little' for the first approaches to post-production and editing. Too bad because the environments were not bad! si la foto non è granchè... ne ho fatte parecchie e molte erano da buttare. E' stato un buon allenamento su diversi fronti. un po' per prendere dimestichezza con l'obiettivo (solo davanti al pc mi son reso conto dell'errata messa a fuoco), un po' per i primi approcci alla post produzione e fotoritocco. Peccato perchè le ambientazioni non erano male!
sent on October 08, 2013 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Too bad because the environments were not bad „
Why do not you go back to the same location with a model? ;-) " Peccato perchè le ambientazioni non erano male" Perchè non tornare nella location con la stessa la modella?
sent on October 08, 2013 (23:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'll try! have passed 4 years! I need to verify that the wrinkles have come! ;-)
ps: how do I remove it from my profile background? I think something better than this I can find in my photos! ci proverò! son passati 4 anni! devo verificare che non le siano venute rughe!!! ;-)
ps: come faccio a toglierla da sfondo del mio profilo? credo che qualcosa di meglio di questa la posso trovare tra le mie foto!!
sent on October 09, 2013 (0:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
enter your personal page and on the side of the cover photo you will see the white text on a green background "change cover photo" ... click it 8-) entri nella tua pagina personale e a fianco della foto di copertina ti apparirà la scritta bianca su sfondo verde "cambia foto di copertina" ... cliccaci
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
. Mi sembra comunque che la maf sia incerta. Il suo occhio dx è leggermemte fuori pdc, il suo sinistro è completamente fuori fuoco. tenendo presente che era una ripresa frontale su soggetto statico entrambi gli occhi dovevano risultare nitidi e quindi inclusi pdc. Era preferibile chiudere almeno a f.3,2 . (imho) . ciao, lauro 
