What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 29, 2019 (14:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful, honor also to the beautiful composition and colors Stupenda, onore anche alla bella composizione e ai colori |
| sent on April 29, 2019 (16:33) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
user147467 | sent on July 12, 2019 (13:47) | This comment has been translated
Truly beautiful |
| sent on July 13, 2019 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much for coming by. Grazie mille per essere passata. |
| sent on July 13, 2019 (21:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The subject is definitely very nice but unfortunately the shot does not do justice to this butterfly. The main flaw is the lack of detail which, freehand and on active subjects, is always difficult to obtain. Where possible, the use of the tripod is recommended in this genre and allows a more precise MAF and better parallelism with the wings of the subject; Finally, a slightly more closed diaphragm would have helped extend the depth of field. Il soggetto è sicuramente molto bello ma purtroppo lo scatto non rende giustizia a questa farfalla. Il principale difetto consiste nella mancanza di dettaglio che, a mano libera e su soggetti in attività, è sempre difficile da ottenere. Dove possibile, l'uso del treppiede è consigliato in questo genere e consente una MAF più precisa ed un migliore parallelismo con le ali del soggetto; infine un diaframma un po' più chiuso avrebbe aiutato ad estendere la profondità di campo. |
| sent on July 14, 2019 (19:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, unfortunately the butterfly house is forbidden to use flash and caval, as the latter would be to get in the way in the interior walkways, as a result you are obliged to work on open diaphragm and high iso. Instead The flash is forbidden because they say it ruins the wings of butterflies.
Thank you for commenting anyway what you wrote is true. Ciao, purtroppo alla casa delle farfalle è proibito usare flash e cavaletto, in quanto quest'ultimo sarebbe di intralcio nei camminamenti interni, di conseguenza si è obbligati a lavorare a diaframma aperto e iso alti. Invece Il flash e proibito perché loro dicono che rovine le ali delle farfalle.
Grazie del commento in ogni caso quello che hai scritto è vero. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
