What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 248000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 21, 2018 (4:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I am not mistaken it seems a Kestrel. Nice catch. Se non vado errato sembra un gheppio. Bella presa. |
| sent on April 21, 2018 (5:46) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
user28347 | sent on April 21, 2018 (10:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you a Kestrel si un gheppio |
| sent on April 21, 2018 (11:54) | This comment has been translated
Great catch! |
| sent on April 21, 2018 (22:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
100% female Kestrel 100% gheppio femmina |
| sent on April 22, 2018 (7:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the move, I would have hoped after you take them into something better, like sharpness, but you can see that the tamron that much at 300 not, I set a fast time and Aperture at f8 ... perhaps I should disconnect the shock mount. Anyway I got lucky I had gone to visit an archaeological site and I also took the kestrel. :-D Grazie a tutti per il passaggio, avrei sperato dopo averle scattate in qualcosa di meglio, come nitidezza, ma si vede che il tamron più di tanto a 300 non da, ho impostato un tempo veloce e il diaframma a f8... forse dovevo disinserire l'antivibrazione. Comunque ho avuto fortuna ero andato a visitare un sito archeologico e ho preso anche il gheppio. |
| sent on May 20, 2018 (17:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Tamron, I had it, and, for what it costs is a great lens, but for photographic hunting it takes something more. I have taken (used, at 700 euros), the Sigma C 150-600 which gives interesting results. I think the very good sensor of the 7200 is going to go to weddings.
however is (relatively) heavy and cumbersome.
Il Tamron, l'ho avuto, e, per quel che costa, è un ottimo obiettivo, ma per caccia fotografica ci vuole qualcosa di più. Io ho preso (usato, a 700 euri), il Sigma C 150-600 che dà risultati interessanti. Credo che l'ottimo sensore della 7200 ci vada a nozze.
Però è (relativamente) pesante e ingombrante.
P.S. Comunque, se imposti un tempo di sicurezza, lo stabilizzatore tienilo spento. C'è chi dice di usarlo sempre. Secondo me sbaglia.
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
