JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 249000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 28, 2012 (15:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
subject position-light fine But everything else is to be reviewed ... But little things that make the difference. For example the cut ... too much air above for a close-up of the genre. And then the PP should better exploit the brightness of the female face ... working channels maybe ;-) posizione soggetto-luce ottimi tutto il resto però è da rivedere ... piccole cose che però fanno la differenza. Ad esempio il taglio... troppa aria sopra per un primo piano del genere. E poi la PP dovrebbe valorizzare meglio la luminosità del volto femminile... lavorando sui canali magari ;-)
sent on October 28, 2012 (15:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much for the passage and comment. I will try to follow your advice, but ... Just to understand better, when you refer to channels do you mean exactly?
Thanks again
greetings Grazie mille per il passaggio e il commento. Proverò a seguire i tuoi consigli ma... Solo per capire meglio, quando ti riferisci ai canali cosa intendi esattamente?
sent on October 28, 2012 (23:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition and colors. The 500 iso feel a tad bringing out the noise. Currency to take in the future a reflector of 80 cm to light, taking advantage of the natural light, the model's face. Analysis of future upgrade the 450d with a Canon 5d old or II or a canon 1d mark III used, very well suited for these occasions and for landscaping and even light optics (f.2, 8) for use with apertures; -) Hello and good light, laurel Buoni la composizione e le cromie. I 500 iso si sentono facendo emergere un pelino il rumore digitale. Valuta di prendere in futuro un pannello riflettente da 80 cm per illuminare, sfruttando la luce naturale, il viso della modella. Valuta in futuro di upgradare la 450d con una canon 5d old o II o una canon 1d mark III usate, molto indicate per queste riprese e per la paesaggistica e anche un'ottica luminosa (f.2,8) da usare con diaframmi aperti Ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on October 28, 2012 (23:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lauro! Thanks for the comments. This is a picture made my wife a summer evening before going to dinner ...
I'll try some far more "structured" to do some testing technique portraiture. Thanks again for the comments always very welcome! Ciao Lauro! Grazie mille per i commenti. Questa è una foto fatta a mia moglie una sera estiva prima di andare a cena...
Proverò in situazioni più "strutturate" a fare qualche prova di tecnica ritrattistica. Un grazie ancora per i sempre graditissimi commenti!
sent on November 15, 2014 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How beautiful! The next time you go to dinner, bring a good set of studio lights in a breast pocket;-) Che bella! La prossima volta che vai a cena, portati un buon set di luci da studio nel taschino