What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 247000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 16, 2016 (23:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gorgeous! Bellissima! |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (2:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful :) Bella :) |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (7:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Marzio, beautiful, hello Complimenti Marzio, bellissima, ciao |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (8:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A show wow! Compliments!!!! Uno spettacolo Complimenti!!!! |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (9:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
These astrophotos fascinate me and shooting really a wonderful show! Marzio Congratulations! Good bye and have a nice Sunday !
Maximum :-) Queste astrofotografie mi affascinano e riprendono davvero uno spettacolo meraviglioso ! Complimenti Marzio ! Ciao e buona Domenica ! Massimo |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Marzio beautiful! ! Complimenti Marzio bellissima! ! |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (17:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations very beautiful Complimenti molto bella |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow fantastic! Fantastica |
user28347 | sent on January 17, 2016 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice prominence tomato ;-) seems in 3d molto bello il risalto del pomodorosembra in 3d |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Congrats
Joseph Molto bella,complimenti Giuseppe |
| sent on January 17, 2016 (20:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
SQM 18.67 ???? If you were 21, how do you come? Miraculous SQM 18.67???? Se stavi a 21, come ti veniva? Miracolosa |
| sent on January 18, 2016 (4:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marzio great! This is superb! The nebula is almost stereoscopic 3D! How did you do that? wow! :-) Grande Marzio! questa è superba! La nebula è stereoscopica quasi in 3D! ma come hai fatto? |
| sent on January 18, 2016 (7:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really wonderful !!! He says Beppe seems to look inside an aquarium of stars and see us this floating jellyfish !! ;-)
Image incredible !! Compliments Davvero magnifica!!! Come dice Beppe sembra quasi di guardare dentro un acquario di stelle e vederci fluttuare questa medusa!! Immagine incredibile!! Complimenti |
| sent on January 18, 2016 (18:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
March Hello, I join the congratulations, beautiful image! I tried to resume the Jellyfish Nebula from home with Canon 20Da and telephoto Nikon 300mm f4.5 ED + filter against light pollution UHC-E, a little something out 'pulling' the histogram a lot, but in my images there is no trace of the small intestine nebulosity background ... yours is truly remarkable. The Canon FD 400mm f2.8 lens confirms excellent for astronomical photographs. Marco Ciao Marzo, mi unisco ai complimenti, bellissima immagine ! Ho provato a riprendere la Nebulosa Medusa da casa con Canon 20Da e teleobiettivo Nikon 300mm ED f4.5 + filtro contro inquinamento luminoso UHC-E, qualcosina esce 'tirando' molto l'istogramma, ma nelle mie immagini non c'è traccia della tenue nebulosità di fondo ... la tua è veramente notevole. Il Canon 400mm FD f2.8 si conferma lente eccellente per fotografie astronomiche. Marco |
| sent on January 18, 2016 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately answer only now, I apologize: -D
Meanwhile, thanks to everyone, to those who passed and left just a greeting ... thank you thank you thank you.
sapf: there are now .... that's it !!!!! -D: -D: -D
sunblack: yes exactly 18,67 and before you fall on, just before midnight, I recorded the highest value of 18.99 SQM. Who want to blacks skies! I consider that so I had to use a LP filter, mine is an old deep-sky Lumicon, which introduces significant aberrations at the edges. just over three hours, I had planned a seven hours but I had to give. But ... I am satisfied: -D
Beppe Reda: Beppe what a pleasure to read you :-) How did I do? bho I do not knowI can only say that the signal is very weak. I made a first processing the PI that I gave a great satisfaction. Then they started again trying to take to the limit all the steps. This is the result, but in doing so unfortunately came out much more all disorders and defects. Come on, I'm happy! Thanks again: -D
Slashleo: Considering that I had to work a lot to the containment of the stars .... but were very much piùwow! -D
Marco: I must say that this is so the 400 f / 2.8 is tougher than ever, unfortunately has a major defect .... seems to be made of lead, is very heavy, but ..... gives a lot of satisfaction. :-) I also responded to another review. I repeat NOT PIGNOLO us on these pages just to confrontNo?
Thanks thanks thanks
Hello, Marzio Purtroppo rispondo solo ora, chiedo venia Intanto un grazie a tutti quanti, a chi è passato e ha lasciato anche solo un saluto... grazie grazie grazie. @sapf: ora ci sono....ecco cos'è !!!!! @sunblack: sì proprio così 18,67 e prima che si coprisse, poco prima di mezzanotte, ho registrato il valore più alto SQM 18,99. Che voglia di cieli neri! Considera che così ho dovuto usare un filtro LP, il mio è un vecchio deep-sky Lumicon, che introduce notevoli aberrazioni ai bordi. poco più di tre ore, avevo progettato una 7 ore ma ho dovuto desistere. Ma... sono soddisfatto @Beppe Reda: Beppe che piacere leggerti Come ho fatto? bho non lo so, posso solo dire che il segnale è molto debole. Ho fatto una prima elaborazione i PI che non mi dato una grande soddisfazione. Allora sono ripartito cercando di portare al limite tutti i passaggi. Questo è il risultato, ma così facendo purtroppo sono usciti molto di più tutti i disturbi e i difetti. Dai, sono contento! Grazie ancora @Slashleo: considera che ho dovuto lavorare moltissimo al contenimento delle stelle.... erano molto ma molto di più @Marco: devo dire che è proprio così il 400 f/2.8 è tostissimo, purtroppo ha un grosso difetto.... sembra fatto di piombo, è pesantissimo, ma..... dà un sacco di soddisfazioni. Ho risposto anche all'altro tuo commento. Ripeto NON SEI PIGNOLO siamo su queste pagine proprio per confrontarci no? Grazie Grazie Grazie Ciao, Marzio |
| sent on January 20, 2016 (9:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
We passed !! Ci siamo superati!! |
| sent on January 22, 2016 (18:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful and thank goodness that the signal was weak !!! -D
Hello!!! Meravigliosa e meno male che il segnale era debole!!! Ciao!!! |
| sent on January 23, 2016 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Vincenzo :-P Grazie Vincenzo |
| sent on January 23, 2016 (13:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is just that the signal a pittance, but pulling pulling ..... Thank you: D
Hello! Si è proprio così il segnale una miseria, ma tirando tirando..... Grazie Ciao! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |