JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
You can buy an usage license for this photo. For info and prices contact Alberto Ghizzi Panizza at the e-mail a.ghizzipanizza@virgilio.it ; specify the title of the photo that you want and the usage that you request.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 248000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 17, 2013 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Qesto "pose" in particular, in addition to the technical nature of the shot, it's a hoot! :-) :-) Qesta "posa" in particolare, oltre alla tecnicità dello scatto, è uno spasso!
sent on June 17, 2013 (20:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I realized now that the two photos I posted a couple of the bridesmaids were taken at f / 8 and not at f16, I corrected the data. Now the criticism unleashed! :-P:-P:-P Mi sono accorto ora che le due foto che ho pubblicato delle damigelle in coppia sono state scattate a f/8 e non a f16, ho corretto i dati. Adesso scatenate le critiche!
sent on June 17, 2013 (20:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-D:-D forgiven because you are good but at least I risparmiavi all the old story / lecture on not doing so at f 16:-D perdonato perchè sei bravo ma almeno mi risparmiavi tutta la solfa/paternale sul non farlo ad f 16
sent on June 17, 2013 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
EXCEPTIONAL! If possible, can you tell which program do you use for the union of the shots? E C C E Z I O N A L E ! Se possibile, puoi dirci che programma usi per l'unione degli scatti?
sent on June 17, 2013 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the information, I had done some testing with "Sonata stacker", have you ever heard? Grazie per l'informazione, avevo fatto qualche prova con "zerene stacker", l'hai mai sentito?
sent on June 17, 2013 (22:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I did some testing with "Sonata stacker", have you ever heard? „
Yeah I know, I tried it in the trial version and the results are similar. I had bought Helicon and then always use that. " avevo fatto qualche prova con "zerene stacker", l'hai mai sentito?" Si lo conosco, l'ho provato nella versione di prova ed i risultati sono simili. Io mi ero comprato Helicon e quindi uso sempre quello.
sent on June 18, 2013 (8:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ were taken at f / 8 and not at f16, I corrected the data. Now unleashed criticism „
then my questions and concerns were legitimate ;-)
No one is sparking criticism, that is clear, perhaps a better comparison would be appropriate to understand from the outset without creating unnecessary confusion, but even that has its own because, as they say, for better or for worse as long as we speak, and here it seems to me that the confusion we have to sell ;-) nice video, especially when you move your mouth, you see that they are alive, damn it in my picture you can see his mouth moving, even in your video, how lucky to have them shooting his mouth closed. Congratulations again. " sono state scattate a f/8 e non a f16, ho corretto i dati. Adesso scatenate le critiche!"
allora le mie domande e i dubbi erano leciti
Nessuno sta scatenando le critiche, che sia chiaro, forse un confronto per capire meglio sarebbe stato opportuno fin dall'inizio senza creare inutile scompiglio, ma anche questo ha il suo perchè, come si dice, nel bene o nel male purchè se ne parli, e qui mi sembra che di scompiglio ne abbiamo da vendere bello il video, specialmente quando muovono la bocca, si vede che sono vive, porca miseria nelle mie foto si vede la bocca che si muove, anche nel tuo video, che fortunato ad averle riprese a bocca chiusa. Complimenti ancora.
sent on June 18, 2013 (8:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Olpi and Free Spirit
This is the second video I've done, but when I saw that the breeze had dropped and that the situation was perfect for shooting I started to shoot up to when it was possible ...
Grazie Olpi e Free Spirit
Questo è il secondo video che ho fatto, ma quando ho visto che la brezza era calata e che la situazione era perfetta per fotografare ho cominciato a scattare fino a quando è stato possibile...
sent on June 18, 2013 (9:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
One shot that leaves you speechless ... absolutely fantastic! compliments, Roberto. Uno scatto che lascia senza parole... assolutamente fantastico! complimenti, Roberto.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
