What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 02, 2024 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is always necessary, when there are colors such as whites hit by light, to pay more attention to the exposure, since in this case several petals are burnt. Probably a compensation would have solved it.
It is true that the optics used are valid optics, but pay attention to diffraction with such closed apertures, the danger is always around the corner. Occorre sempre quando vi sono colori come i bianchi colpiti dalla luce porre maggiore attenzione all'esposizione visto che in questo caso diversi petali risultano bruciati. Probabilmente una compensazione avrebbe risolto.
Vero che l'ottica utilizzato è una valida ottica, però poni attenzione alla diffrazione con diaframmi così chiusi, il pericolo è sempre dietro l'angolo. |
| sent on May 02, 2024 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image is not to be thrown away, I like it enough; it is certain that by presenting it in this way, the flower takes on an equal/preponderant value compared to the Misumena: therefore the yield of the flower must be the best possible: here there are too many petals with burnt white; Surely you could have recovered something in post-production, especially from the RAW file, with a little patience..... or option two could have been to make a considerable crop, centralizing the crop on the real subject of the shot (which seems to me to hold up well at a much higher magnification), so some outline petaline could fit even with a white off limits :-) L'immagine non è da buttar via, mi piace abbastanza; certo è che presentandola così il fiore assume una valenza uguale/preponderante rispetto al Misumena: perciò la resa del fiore deve essere la migliore possibile: qui sono troppi i petali col bianco bruciato; senz'altro qualcosa avresti potuto recuperare in post produzione, specialmente dal file raw, con un po di pazienza..... oppure l'opzione due avrebbe potute essere quella di praticare un notevole crop, centralizzando il ritaglio sul vero soggetto dello scatto (che mi pare regga bene un ingrandimento di parecchio maggiore), così qualche petalino di contorno ci poteva stare pur con un bianco off limits |
| sent on May 02, 2024 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks for the considerations and advice I
try to review the raw if they are burned there too grazie per le considerazioni e i consigli
provo a rivedere il raw se anche li sono bruciati |
| sent on May 03, 2024 (9:06)
Hello guys, this girl is Thomisus onustus, not misumena vatia. |
| sent on May 03, 2024 (12:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok thank you very much, the chameleon is a transformer, what distinguishes them? ok
grazie tantissimo, il camaleonte è un trasformista, cosa li distingue? |
| sent on May 03, 2024 (12:40)
Misumena vatia is more round, and Thomisus onustus is a bit triangle, either head and belly. Misumena can change color with two colors possible white and yellow. Thomisus as three colors: white, yellow and pink. |
| sent on May 03, 2024 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok thanks, so slight differences in shape ok grazie, quindi lievi differenze nella forma |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
